There are some online casinos which provide no-deposit bonuses, ranging from $10 to $25 for a player looking for casino gaming (including internet video streaming). Those online casinos that provide gamers to deal with the live dealer through their web cam streaming facilities are found to include most of these games.

This is a common misconception among new players and it denotes an extreme ignorance on some key and fundamental concepts in poker like expected value and variance.

Why?

In order to fully assess the root of this misconception we have to dive deep into the logic behind this reasoning. Let's breakdown some myths around this…

Future Of Online Poker In India Online

Currently, the future of the legal status of poker in India looks bleak. Read on to find out more! According to the Supreme Court, games of chance are illegal, but those which are based on ‘skill’. Considering the skills involved in poker and the craze currently going around the game, Anand sees a bright future for the game in India. According to him, the game has the potential to make it big in the near future. “There is a lot of scope for expansion. It is very similar to chess to be able to access online.

“It's better to sacrifice a bit of long-term EV in order to reduce short term variance”

I won't state this is wrong. There's some truth behind it but not as many people think. Let's start by listing the situations where I would be comfortable passing small/marginal EV decisions…

Future Of Online Poker In India Rupees

• If I have an edge against the majority of the players on my table.
• If we´re talking about $EV instead of chip EV
• The amount of chips we´re risking do not compensate the risk we´re taking.

Besides all of those, I just won't be passing any EV situations at my table. If someone comes along and gives you $100 you won't turn it down to wait and see if someone else comes and offers you more money…Would you? Of course not! By passing EV situations, regardless how marginal or small they are, is precisely the equivalent of rejecting those $100. Let's break it down each one of those

If I have an edge against the majority of the players on my table.

If I have a genuine edge against most of the players on my table then it makes sense letting pass some marginal EV situations in order to exploit these players postflop in a much better situations.

For example, let's say I am playing in a turbo 1-table SNG against the top 5 best players in that format. In that case, I am more than happy to flip preflop for 50bb-60bb effective stack since my postflop edges against them aren't any better than taking a flip in an all-in situation preflop. Contrary to this, let's say I am playing the same format but this time playing against 5 bad players. In this situation I won't be flipping a 50bb-60bb effective stack in a marginal all-in preflop situation.

Why?

I can make up all the EV lost there by exploiting them postflop on later hands. It just makes more sense to me. If we're talking about $EV instead of chip EV Obviously, here we're referring to late stages in a tournament where ICM takes a major role influencing our decisions at the table. In this situation, we have to take into account future EV a lot more and take pay jumps into account. The amount of chips we´re risking do not compensate the risk we're taking.

This is pretty similar to the first one. A common situation to this is in the first stages of a tournament and we´re facing a potential all-in situation with 100bb preflop with AK. It makes no sense flipping for that many big blinds so early on a tournament where bad players, fish, maniacs, and calling stations are all over the place.